In this opinion piece published by the National Post, Donna Kennedy-Glans argues that Alberta’s upcoming referendum debate should not be viewed simply as a separatist movement, but as a broader discussion about the future of Canadian Confederation and Alberta’s role within it.

The article references historical comments by Clifford Sifton, a key architect of Western Canadian development, who believed the Prairies should primarily support the economic prosperity of Eastern Canada.Kennedy-Glans contends that this historic arrangement no longer feels fair to many Albertans.

The author discusses Alberta Premier Danielle Smith’s decision to avoid a binding separation referendum and instead ask voters whether Alberta should remain within Canada or begin a constitutional process toward a different arrangement.Smith has stated she supports remaining in Canada but will respect the outcome of the vote.

Kennedy-Glans describes the political reaction as highly emotional, with separatists, federalists, and defenders of the status quo all claiming to represent ordinary Albertans.

She argues that the debate reflects deeper concerns about economic fairness, national unity, energy policy, and Canada’s ability to adapt to global economic and geopolitical pressures.The article also highlights Alberta’s importance to Canada’s economy, particularly through energy exports and trade with the United States.Kennedy-Glans suggests Canada must modernize Confederation to address changing economic realities and international competition.

While expressing support for Canada, she argues that Albertans increasingly feel they contribute disproportionately to the federation while receiving criticism rather than respect.

Ultimately, the piece presents the referendum as an opportunity for an overdue national conversation about shared prosperity, regional autonomy, and whether Canada’s federal system can evolve to meet modern challenges.