The UK Attorney General, Lord Hermer, has stated that he had “no doubt” about referring to the Court of Appeal a controversial sentencing decision involving three teenage boys convicted of raping two girls in Hampshire.The offences took place in separate incidents in Fordingbridge in November 2024 and January 2025, involving victims aged 15 and 14.Two of the offenders were 14 years old at the time, while a third boy, aged 13, was convicted for involvement in one of the attacks.

Despite being found guilty at Southampton Crown Court, the boys were spared custodial sentences and instead received youth rehabilitation orders, with the trial judge emphasising rehabilitation and the offenders’ young age, as well as positive behaviour during proceedings.

The decision sparked widespread criticism from victims’ families, politicians, and members of the public, with one victim describing the sentence as feeling like a “rock in my face”.The victims and their families have spoken about the lasting psychological impact, including fear and ongoing trauma.

In response, Lord Hermer said he acted quickly after reviewing the case, including reading victim impact statements, and sought to ensure that uncertainty did not continue for those affected.

Under the Unduly Lenient Sentence scheme, the Attorney General can refer cases to the Court of Appeal if a sentence appears significantly out of line with sentencing expectations.

The Court of Appeal will now consider whether the original decision was appropriate under sentencing guidelines, which prioritise rehabilitation for children but also allow custody in serious cases.

The case has intensified debate over how the justice system should balance rehabilitation for young offenders with punishment and protection for victims, particularly in serious sexual offences.Political figures have also criticised the outcome, while the Attorney General has emphasised the need to ensure the system works for victims.