The article reports on criticism of the Trump administration's latest request to the U.S.Supreme Court concerning mail-in voting rules.According to the report, the administration is seeking to revive an executive order after lower courts blocked efforts to tighten regulations related to mail-in ballots.

During an interview on CNN, Georgetown University constitutional law professor Michele Goodwin described the legal strategy as unprecedented, arguing that it attempts to expand presidential authority into an area that has historically been managed by individual states.

Goodwin noted that a First Circuit Court of Appeals panel, including a judge appointed by President Trump, upheld an injunction against the executive order, concluding that it was legally invalid.She emphasized that election administration has long been considered a responsibility of state governments under the U.S.constitutional system.Goodwin also placed the legal effort within the broader context of Trump's longstanding skepticism toward U.S.elections following the 2020 presidential election.

She referenced his repeated claims that the election was rigged and noted that the vast majority of his post-election legal challenges were unsuccessful.

Based on her constitutional analysis, Goodwin argued that the administration's current request is unlikely to succeed, describing it as 'dead on arrival.' However, she also acknowledged uncertainty about how the Supreme Court might ultimately rule.

The article primarily presents Goodwin's legal assessment and frames the administration's filing as another chapter in the continuing national debate over election authority and mail-in voting policies.