Veteran journalist Dan Rather has expressed concern over a proposed voting legislation known as the SAVE Act, which he says could negatively affect women’s ability to register to vote.

In an opinion piece titled “The War on Women,” Rather argues that the bill, supported by former President Donald Trump, could function as a form of voter suppression.

His main concern centers on a provision requiring voter registration details to match birth certificates, which he claims could disproportionately affect women who have changed their last names after marriage.

Rather cites data indicating that a large majority of women in the United States adopt their spouse’s surname, with additional percentages using hyphenated or modified names.

He argues that this discrepancy between legal identification documents and birth records could create bureaucratic barriers that prevent otherwise eligible voters from registering.According to his analysis, such rules could ultimately disenfranchise millions of women.Beyond voting legislation, Rather also criticizes broader policy directions he attributes to the Trump political movement.

He claims these include efforts to reduce funding for reproductive health services, limit women’s economic opportunities, and roll back programs that expand women’s participation in military and professional sectors.He also suggests that cultural and policy shifts are aimed at reinforcing traditional gender roles.

Rather frames these developments as part of a broader political strategy to maintain electoral power by suppressing demographics perceived as increasingly oppositional, particularly younger women.

The article presents his viewpoint as a warning about the potential democratic consequences of the SAVE Act and related policy initiatives, especially regarding access to voting rights and gender equality in civic participation.