The Philippine Department of Justice has defended its decision to subpoena former President Rodrigo Duterte's bank and tax records, calling the move a 'tool of fishing expedition' aimed at gathering information for an ongoing impeachment trial.

The subpoena, issued as part of the Senate's inquiry into alleged corruption and abuse of power, has drawn criticism from legal experts who argue it lacks clear legal basis.

The defense emphasized that the request is part of a systematic investigation into potential violations of the Constitution, not a targeted effort to harass Duterte.

The case stems from allegations that Duterte's administration engaged in unethical practices during his tenure, including misuse of public funds and influence-peddling.

Legal analysts note that while the subpoena is legally permissible under existing laws, its timing and scope have raised concerns about political motivations.The Senate's impeachment proceedings against Duterte, which began in 2025, have been marred by procedural disputes and accusations of bias.

Critics argue that the subpoena could undermine the credibility of the judicial process, while supporters maintain it is necessary to ensure accountability.The Department of Justice has reiterated its commitment to transparency, stating that all evidence collected will be subject to judicial review.This case highlights the complex interplay between legal procedures, political power, and public trust in the Philippine legal system.