The defense team of Vice President Sara Duterte asserted during the impeachment trial that the House prosecution lacks sufficient evidence to prove she hired an assassin to kill President Ferdinand 'Bongbong' Marcos Jr.

Lawyer Mark Vinluan emphasized that the prosecution's admission before the court clarified their position, stating there is no competent evidence to support the claim.Vinluan criticized Calilung's testimony and other alleged evidence as insufficient to substantiate the accusations.

The defense also highlighted that Duterte's inciting remarks were a reaction to threats under 'Operation Romanov,' a plot targeting her family.Lawyer Michael Poa claimed the third day of proceedings was successful, noting they achieved their objectives.

The article underscores the legal battle over the impeachment case, with the defense challenging the prosecution's evidence and framing the controversy around familial safety and political tensions.