A bitter dispute over the conduct of NSW's top prosecutor has exposed a deeper divide over how the state prosecutes rape cases, threatening public trust in the law.A highly contested parliamentary inquiry has accused the state's director of public prosecutions of lying, sparking outrage among legal experts.

Barrister Mark Tedeschi called the findings 'extraordinary', while former ICAC lawyer Geoffrey Watson described them as 'genuinely shocking'.

The inquiry's revelations have intensified debates about the handling of sexual assault cases, with concerns about transparency and accountability in the legal system.The controversy highlights tensions between prosecutors and legal professionals, raising questions about the integrity of rape case prosecutions.This conflict underscores broader societal issues regarding trust in institutions and the need for reform in how sexual assault cases are managed.The fallout could have lasting implications for both the legal system and public perception of justice.