Economist Henrietta Treyz, director of economic policy at Veda Partners, argued during a CNN interview that the Trump administration's rapid effort to finalize a new agreement with Iran may reflect growing concern about economic pressures linked to the recent 106-day conflict.

According to Treyz, the administration appeared eager to secure the deal before its full details were publicly released, suggesting that policymakers are worried about maintaining stability in energy markets and preventing further increases in gasoline prices.The agreement reportedly includes reopening the Strait of Hormuz, a critical shipping route for global oil supplies.Analysts believe this could help ease pressure on energy markets and provide temporary relief from elevated fuel costs.Treyz noted that the administration has also relied on releases from the U.S.

Strategic Petroleum Reserve to help stabilize oil prices, but she warned that this approach has limits and may not be sustainable for an extended period.Her comments came as inflation and the cost of living remain major concerns for American voters ahead of the 2026 midterm elections.The article states that recent economic data showed inflation rising by 4.2% over the previous year, with higher energy prices playing a significant role.

Treyz's central argument was that the speed of the negotiations indicates officials may be concerned that available policy tools are becoming less effective at containing fuel costs.

As a result, the Iran agreement could be viewed not only as a diplomatic development but also as an attempt to reduce economic risks associated with prolonged instability in global energy markets.