U.S.President Donald Trump's recent threats to launch a massive attack on Iran have raised alarms among experts, who warn of catastrophic humanitarian and strategic consequences.

Political scientist Robert Pape, in an analysis published on his Substack, argues that Trump's remarks about Iran having 'not suffered enough' signal a potential escalation that could target Tehran's critical infrastructure, including its power grid.

Pape highlights the risks of such an attack, noting that disabling electricity in a city with ten million residents would cause unimaginable suffering and likely deepen public anger rather than prompt political capitulation.

He warns that targeting energy infrastructure is a strategy historically associated with prolonged conflict and retaliation, as governments prioritizing survival often resist external punishment.

The article underscores concerns about the Trump administration's readiness to execute such a plan, emphasizing the potential for widespread regional instability and the dangers posed to civilians, military personnel, and international allies.

Analysts stress that while Trump's rhetoric suggests a willingness to escalate tensions, the actual impact could far exceed immediate military objectives, creating long-term geopolitical challenges.