A New York Times columnist, Maureen Dowd, sharply criticized President Donald Trump's public address, arguing that his speech failed to incite the anger he intended.

Dowd suggested Trump's inability to provoke outrage stemmed from a 'manhood' issue, a concept linked to the military's alleged challenges.She highlighted the lack of response from Republicans, TV networks, and even Fox News, which typically amplifies Trump's rhetoric.Dowd mocked Trump's 'superpower' of creating an alternate reality for his supporters, noting that his speech lacked the usual fervor.The article also mentions Trump's criticism of media outlets like ABC and NBC, while Fox News avoided discussing the speech the following day.Dowd implied that Trump may need a 'chemical boost' to regain influence, though she questioned the feasibility of such a solution.The piece underscores the broader political and media dynamics surrounding Trump's public statements and their reception.