The article critiques the overemphasis on legal procedures in impeachment trials, arguing that public trust and political judgment should take precedence.

It highlights how lawyers' focus on courtroom norms can hinder the democratic process, which requires evaluating whether an official has abused public trust rather than merely determining criminal liability.The Senate's role is framed as a balancing act between accountability and governance, not just legal technicalities.

Senator Lacson's stance is praised for aligning with constitutional principles, emphasizing that impeachment should prioritize ethical considerations and public service over legalistic approaches.

The piece warns against 'judicializing' the process, urging senators to ask questions about public impact rather than fixating on procedural details.It concludes that while legal norms are valuable, they must not overshadow the broader purpose of safeguarding constitutional governance.