More than 300 organizations have urged Office of Management and Budget Director Russell Vought to extend the public comment period for a proposed federal grant rule that would significantly increase political oversight of how federal funds are distributed.

Critics argue that the proposal would give political appointees greater authority to review and approve grants, potentially allowing ideological considerations to influence funding decisions across a wide range of government programs.

According to the proposal, agencies would be required to conduct reviews of grants before issuance to ensure they align with federal priorities, applicable laws, and what the administration defines as the national interest.

The rule also includes provisions that could restrict funding for organizations considered to promote certain viewpoints or policies opposed by the administration.

Opponents, including scientific, public health, environmental, and legal advocacy groups, warn that the changes could affect research funding, public education, health initiatives, disaster relief programs, and economic development projects.

Some organizations contend that the proposal raises constitutional concerns related to free speech, equal protection, and the balance of power between Congress and the executive branch.

Democratic lawmakers have also criticized the rule, arguing that it could allow political loyalty to influence access to federally appropriated funds.

Representative Rosa DeLauro stated that the proposal could result in the denial of funding for critical programs if recipients are viewed as insufficiently aligned with the administration.

Supporters of the criticism characterize the measure as a significant expansion of executive authority over federal spending, while the proposal remains under public review.