KillBait - News highlights delivered clearly and responsibly—no clickbait, no sensationalism
Questions raised over New Mexico officials' handling of former prosecutor linked to Jeffrey Epstein
Photo: Raw Story - Celebrating 20 Years of Independent Journalism
2026-06-02 16:02   Justice   12

Questions raised over New Mexico officials' handling of former prosecutor linked to Jeffrey Epstein

A report has sparked renewed scrutiny in New Mexico over former U.S.attorney John J.Kelly, who has been linked to Jeffrey Epstein through previously undisclosed connections.Kelly, who served as U.S.attorney for the District of New Mexico from 1993 to 2000, was revealed in April to have had ties to Epstein, including documentation suggesting Epstein granted him power of attorney to assist in the purchase of the Zorro Ranch property in New Mexico.

The revelations have intensified debate about whether local political and institutional figures adequately addressed concerns related to Epstein’s activities during that period.

Journalist Alisa Valdes-Rodriguez has accused New Mexico’s political and media establishment of continuing to protect Kelly despite the emerging documentation.

She argues that key institutions have not fully examined available records and have instead accepted Kelly’s denials of meaningful involvement with Epstein.Kelly has stated he never met Epstein and only had limited awareness of any real estate-related matters.

The article also references historical allegations involving Epstein’s New Mexico ranch, including a report filed by a 16-year-old victim, Annie Farmer, who alleged abuse at the property.

According to reporting cited in the article, that complaint was made while Kelly held his position as top federal prosecutor, and questions remain about how it was handled at the time.

Despite these concerns, Kelly continues to serve on Albuquerque’s Ethics Board as a mayoral appointee, and there has been no public indication of formal questioning under oath.

Critics argue that the lack of investigative action reflects broader institutional reluctance to re-examine past oversight failures connected to Epstein’s operations in the state.The situation has fueled ongoing debate about accountability and transparency in historical cases involving powerful figures.

Full reading at Raw Story - Celebrating 20 Years of Independent Journalism

2224 
Top Trends
Topics
Top visited