This opinion piece reflects on Jose Rizal's enduring relevance by focusing on his attitude toward life, death, and service to the Filipino nation.

Inspired by historian Ambeth Ocampo's observation that Rizal had already accepted the possibility of death years before his execution in 1896, the author argues that Rizal's readiness did not come from despair but from a life dedicated to meaningful work for his country.

The article contrasts Sigmund Freud's concept of the death drive (Thanatos) with the life drive (Eros), concluding that Rizal embodied the latter through his writing, scholarship, medical practice, and advocacy for the dignity of Filipinos.It also discusses the Stoic idea of memento mori, which reminds people of their mortality and encourages them to live purposefully.According to the author, Rizal accepted death because he had already devoted himself to serving the nation.Citing Rizal's letters to Marcelo H.del Pilar, the piece highlights his preparedness for death and his unwavering commitment to public service.

Building on these ideas, the author introduces the concept of 'Ganang Rizal,' described as a philosophy of living with energy, creativity, compassion, and dedication for the good of the country.Rather than glorifying sacrifice alone, it encourages Filipinos to create, organize, heal, love, and inspire positive change while they are alive.

The article ends by challenging readers, especially those approaching or beyond the age of 35—the age at which Rizal died—to reflect on what they have contributed to society and to continue living with purpose in service of the nation.