Court ruling on protest speech raises questions for DOJ case against James Comey
A legal dispute has intensified between the U.S.Department of Justice and the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), with the organization accusing federal officials of violating grand jury secrecy rules.
According to a court filing submitted by SPLC attorneys, Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche and members of the DOJ allegedly distributed a copy of a superseding indictment to members of the press before it had been officially entered into the court docket.
The SPLC argues that such an action conflicts with rules designed to protect the confidentiality of grand jury proceedings and related court documents prior to their formal release.In its filing, the organization criticized what it described as a pattern of improper public communications by DOJ officials regarding the case.
Attorneys referenced earlier incidents in which Blanche allegedly made inaccurate public statements about the investigation, prompting corrections and judicial concerns about the government's duty of candor.The SPLC contends that these previous events should have led the department to exercise greater caution when communicating with the media.As a result, the SPLC has requested that the court order Blanche and other involved officials to explain their actions.
The organization is also seeking a hearing to establish the facts surrounding the alleged disclosure and to determine whether sanctions should be imposed.The underlying criminal case has already generated controversy.Critics have accused Blanche of misrepresenting facts about the SPLC's use of informants within extremist groups.The article notes that statements made publicly by DOJ officials allegedly conflicted with information later acknowledged in court filings.
The latest accusation adds another layer of scrutiny to the ongoing prosecution and raises questions about adherence to legal procedures during the case.
Full reading at Raw Story - Celebrating 20 Years of Independent Journalism