The Supreme Court of Canada has ruled that mandatory registration for all sexual offenders is unconstitutional, shifting the decision to individual judges.

This change allows for case-by-case assessments, as seen in examples where offenders like a man who forced a woman into sex acts or someone who groped a jogger were exempt from the registry.

The ruling reverses a 2011 federal mandate that required all sex offenders to register, sparking debate over balancing judicial discretion with public safety.Critics argue that removing mandatory registration could lead to leniency, while proponents believe it ensures fairer outcomes.

The article highlights how judges now weigh factors like intent, harm, and circumstances, reflecting broader tensions in the justice system between accountability and individual rights.