On May 20, 2026, the U.S.Department of Justice announced the creation of a $1.776 billion 'Anti-Weaponization Fund,' intended to compensate individuals who claim they were targeted for political prosecution, including potential claims against the Biden administration.

The fund was established as part of a settlement in which President Donald Trump dropped his $10 billion lawsuit against the IRS, which alleged harm from leaked tax returns.

Critics argue the fund could benefit Trump allies, including participants in the January 6, 2021, Capitol attack, raising concerns about self-dealing and conflicts of interest.

Legal scholars highlight that allowing a president to effectively settle a lawsuit in which he is a party may violate longstanding moral and legal principles, including the maxim 'no one should be a judge in their own cause.

' Questions also arise about constitutional authority, separation of powers, and potential violations of the Emoluments Clause and Section 4 of the 14th Amendment.The fund will operate under a five-person board appointed by the attorney general, with the president retaining the power to remove members.

While DOJ officials insist the fund is impartial and not limited by political affiliation, the settlement has sparked debate over legality, morality, and the appearance of favoritism in government actions.