Attorneys representing President Donald Trump, his sons, and the Trump Organization have asked a federal judge in the Southern District of Florida to reject an attempt to reopen a previously dismissed lawsuit that resulted in the creation of a $1.8 billion anti-weaponization fund.The lawsuit originated from Trump's claim against the Internal Revenue Service after a contractor leaked his tax returns.Trump had initially sought $10 billion in damages, and the dispute was ultimately resolved through a settlement that established the fund.A group of 35 former federal judges has challenged the settlement, arguing that it was collusive and should be reconsidered.They are seeking to reopen the case and question the legitimacy of the agreement.Trump's legal team responded by asserting that the former judges lack legal standing to challenge the settlement.According to the filing, the allegation that the agreement was collusive does not meet the legal threshold necessary to reopen a closed case.The attorneys characterized the judges' objections as policy disagreements rather than valid claims of fraud.

The dispute has gained additional attention because Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche recently indicated during testimony before a House Appropriations subcommittee that the Department of Justice would not proceed with the anti-weaponization fund.However, Blanche reportedly declined to provide a written commitment on that position.The court filing therefore represents a continued effort by Trump's legal team to preserve the settlement and prevent further litigation.

The case raises questions about the authority to challenge settlements involving federal agencies, the legal standards for reopening closed cases, and the future status of the anti-weaponization fund.