In recent years, social scientists have highlighted concerns about the rise of authoritarian strategies in democratic countries, often referred to as the “authoritarian playbook.

” Although no official book exists, certain leaders have systematically used democratic mechanisms to consolidate power, as seen in countries like Russia and Venezuela.In the U.S.

, nonprofits have faced significant pressure under the second Trump administration, including major funding cuts to organizations supporting healthcare, childcare, food access, and international aid.

Additionally, rules were changed to restrict student loan forgiveness for nonprofit employees and to threaten nonprofits with prosecution for legal advocacy.Congress contributed to this pressure by holding hearings and promoting legislation to label nonprofits as terrorist-supporting organizations.Despite these challenges, many U.S.nonprofits have united to defend their missions, signing open letters, participating in large-scale strategy meetings, and receiving financial support from philanthropic foundations like Open Society Foundations.

However, some organizations have adjusted their activities and language to avoid conflict, including removing references to diversity, equity, and inclusion.The strength, organization, and resilience of the U.S.nonprofit sector contrast with weaker nonprofit sectors in other countries, suggesting that American nonprofits may serve as a model for defending democratic institutions against authoritarian tendencies.