The Senate impeachment court continued the trial of Vice President Sara Duterte, focusing on her alleged unexplained wealth.House prosecutor Chel Diokno outlined 'ultimate facts'—the core elements of the impeachment case—such as her disproportionate wealth, failure to disclose assets, and continued business interests during her tenure.These ultimate facts are supported by 'evidentiary facts,' which are specific details proving the allegations.Legal experts explain that ultimate facts are essential for a case's success, while evidentiary facts provide the supporting evidence.

The prosecution's presentation included testimony from National Bureau of Investigation (NBI) Director Melvin Matibag, marking the 'finale' of their arguments under Article IV, which addresses Duterte's alleged threats against President Ferdinand Marcos Jr.and others.

The article clarifies the legal distinction between these two types of facts, emphasizing their roles in establishing the impeachment case's validity.