This opinion and analysis article argues that controversies surrounding FIFA’s claim of being an apolitical organisation extend far beyond its recent relationship with US President Donald Trump.

Published as the 2026 FIFA World Cup begins in Mexico City, the piece uses the tournament’s opening as an opportunity to reflect on FIFA’s historical connections with political power and authoritarian figures.

The article notes the significance of the opening match at the Estadio Azteca, one of football’s most iconic venues, remembered for landmark moments involving Pelé and Diego Maradona.However, rather than focusing on on-field action, the author examines the broader political context surrounding international football governance.

The central argument is that FIFA has long maintained relationships with governments and leaders whose actions have raised concerns about democracy, human rights and political influence, despite the organisation frequently presenting itself as politically neutral.The reference to Trump serves as a contemporary example within a much longer pattern.

By challenging the notion that politics and football can be neatly separated, the article suggests that major sporting events often reflect wider geopolitical realities and power structures.

The analysis encourages readers to view the World Cup not only as a sporting spectacle but also as an event shaped by political decisions, institutional interests and historical alliances.Overall, the piece presents a critical examination of FIFA’s governance and its repeated insistence on political neutrality.