The article details the third day of a constitutional case involving Lissu, where he cross-examined the officer-in-charge of the prison regarding restrictions on CHADEMA leaders visiting him.Lissu accused the officer of being influenced by political figures and questioned the practice of barring CHADEMA leaders from meetings.The officer denied these claims and apologized to the court after the chair of the panel intervened.

The case highlights issues of lawyer-client confidentiality, political influence in prison administration, and the rights of political leaders to access their incarcerated counterparts.

Key points include the officer's denial of CCTV surveillance, the presence of officers during private meetings, and the court's potential ruling on the legality of restricting CHADEMA leaders' visits.The article underscores the tension between legal procedures and political dynamics within the justice system.