The article details the ongoing constitutional case involving Tundu Lissu, where his lawyers allege that prison officials at Ukonga Prison are systematically monitoring their communications with him.

During court proceedings, Lissu’s legal team presented evidence that multiple prison officers are present during consultations, using intercom systems and recording devices to intercept private discussions.

The UN Working Group on Arbitrary Detention expressed concern over these practices, stating they violate the right to confidential communication with counsel.The case, Constitutional Cause No.

7300/2026, challenges the legality of measures taken by Ukonga Prison authorities, which include restricting political discussions and withholding documents.Cross-examinations revealed tensions between prison officials and lawyers, with some officers denying the ability to hear conversations.The court is expected to continue hearings as the case progresses, highlighting broader issues of judicial transparency and prisoner rights.

The article underscores the conflict between institutional security protocols and the fundamental legal principle of confidential legal representation.