The article critiques the dominance of elderly politicians, particularly from established dynastic families, in Philippine politics.It highlights how this 'gerontocracy' marginalizes younger, non-dynastic voices by consolidating power and wealth over decades.The author notes that the average age of Philippine presidents since 1986 is 59, far exceeding the constitutional minimum of 40.Similarly, senators average 60 years old, with some like Panfilo Lacson and Tito Sotto in their 70s.This trend enables elderly patriarchs and their children to maintain control, stifling youth participation.The piece argues that gerontocracy weakens accountability, as aging leaders often use health issues as excuses to evade legal consequences.It also points out the lack of meaningful legislation addressing youth concerns like sports, environment, and civic engagement.

The author calls for reforms to curb corruption and empower younger generations to rebuild democratic institutions, emphasizing that trust in government remains low despite public faith in media and civil society.