The South African Parliament's impeachment committee has delayed critical decisions on its proceedings, with President Cyril Ramaphosa's testimony emerging as a major point of contention.

Political divisions between the Government of National Unity coalition partners and the opposition have intensified, as the committee seeks consensus on terms of reference.

Legal advice is being sought to determine if Ramaphosa can be compelled to testify, with a Western Cape high court ruling expected on his interdict application to pause proceedings.Ramaphosa seeks to halt the inquiry until his bid to set aside the Section 89 report on forex theft allegations is resolved.

The draft terms of reference allow for his testimony to be delivered by a representative, avoiding adverse inferences if he declines to appear in person.

This political and legal standoff highlights the complex dynamics within South Africa's governance structure as the country navigates accountability and leadership challenges.