Experts have clarified that Nigeria does not automatically have a legal right to seek compensation from South Africa for property losses by its citizens during anti-illegal immigration protests.The claim hinges on whether the South African government failed in its duty to protect people and property.Nigerian officials assert they intend to pursue compensation for repatriated citizens who allegedly abandoned assets due to violence.However, legal scholars emphasize that international law does not automatically assign state responsibility for such losses.Adv Justice Khoza explains that liability typically rests with individuals who commit acts of vandalism or theft during unrest, not the state.

He notes that while diplomatic protection allows states to represent nationals in certain cases, practical disputes over ownership and valuation are better resolved through domestic courts.Molya Vundamina adds that even if Nigeria initiates a formal claim, the process would require rigorous evidence and could impact bilateral relations.

Both experts agree that individual claims via local legal systems are more feasible than international diplomatic action, highlighting the need for clear proof of ownership and direct causal links to state actions.