More than two weeks after the Albanese government handed down the federal budget, criticism continues over its impact on Australians with disabilities.

According to Greg Jericho, Guardian columnist and chief economist at the Australia Institute, those with disabilities have copped the largest cuts in the budget.

Despite this, public and media attention appears largely focused on the financial outcomes for wealthier Australians, highlighting a perceived imbalance in national priorities.

Jericho argues that the budget reflects a systemic undervaluing of vulnerable communities while protecting affluent groups, drawing attention to what he calls Australia’s 'warped' priorities.

The debate underscores the ongoing tension between social welfare commitments and fiscal policies aimed at economic growth, raising questions about equity, fairness, and the role of government in supporting disadvantaged citizens.

These criticisms come amid broader discussions about how the federal budget allocates resources and the societal implications of such decisions, particularly for groups that rely heavily on government support.The conversation also touches on the influence of media narratives in shaping public perception and political accountability.